New Twists and Turns Mark a
Decade of Internet Job-Hunting:
A Quintessential Careers Annual Report 2006

In 2001, we began a series of annual explorations of the state of Internet job-hunting. Our previous reports include: Internet Job-Hunting Turns a Corner: A Quintessential Careers Annual Report 2005; Major Studies Poke Holes in Value of Internet Job-Hunting: A Quintessential Careers Annual Report 2003; Navigating the Muddled World of Internet Job-hunting: A Quintessential Careers Annual Report 2002; Are the Major Job Boards All They're Cracked Up to Be? A Quintessential Careers Annual Report 2001, with its accompanying how-to article, Maximize Your Internet Job Search.

Are we completely egocentric to declare that Internet job-hunting is 10 years old just because Quintessential Careers is celebrating its 10th anniversary in 2006? Probably. Sure, there are a number of still-existing career sites that predate QuintCareers. But we think it's fair to say that Internet job-hunting began to gain its first real traction a decade ago. Last year we reported a new maturity and positive outlook for job-hunting on the Internet after several yeas of turbulence. This year, the online job-hunt scene still seems to be on an upswing, but with a few twists. As always, we offer good news, bad news, cautionary tales, and surprises.

One surprise is survey research from Peter Weddle that contradicts many previous findings on the effectiveness of Internet job searching. We've reported several times that the percentage of job-seekers obtaining jobs through the Internet is in the single digits. In Weddle's recent Source of Employment Survey, however, 34 percent of respondents said they found their last position on an Internet job board. The second most prevalent source of employment was a call from a headhunter/recruiter. Networking, which we've always touted as the best way to find a job, came in third, but with only 9.3 percent of job-seekers obtaining jobs that way. Do these figures mean the Internet is becoming a much stronger source of jobs than in the recent past? Certainly it has come to dominate recruiting and job-hunting in ways that might not have been imagined a decade ago.

We've touted employers' own Web sites and job boards as up-and-coming sources for leads and positions, but apparently few job-seekers got the message that these sites were up-and-comers since only 2.6 percent of Weddle's survey respondents said they found their jobs in an ad on the employer's Web site. Recruiting guru Dr. John Sullivan declares careers portions of corporate Web sites to be "no more than static and dull resume black holes." (But see the antithesis of these static, dull black holes in CareerXroads Top 25 Corporate Job Sites, the 25 highest rated companies for the job candidate's experience.)

Even more telling may be the stats on venues that Weddle's respondents plan to use for future job-hunting; 69.7 percent said they would use ads posted on Internet job boards, while only 7.8 percent said they would network at work or another business location.

One thing to remember about these surprising figures is that networking is hard; responding to ads on job boards is relatively easy. The fact remains, though, that the vast majority of vacancies are never advertised, so we still stand behind networking as the best way to find a job.

The other point to note about the stats is that you can almost always turn up contradictory findings. A similar study by ExecuNet of sources for job interviews (not actual positions like Weddle's study) surveyed 1,483 professionals with an average salary of $193,000, discovering that the top three sources for job interviews are:
1. Networking contacts (46 percent);
2. Internet job listings (24 percent); and
3. Unsolicited contact from a recruiter (5 percent).

A separate ExecuNet survey of 181 search firms provides additional insight into the value of a strong network. According to this survey, during the past 12 months, 63 percent of all executive job openings were filled with a candidate that was sourced through networking. Other top sources recruiters relied on during the past year include internal resume databases, which helped fill 16 percent of all openings and Internet job postings, which accounted for 11 percent of executive placements. (Granted, the demographic difference between the Weddle and ExecuNet studies may account for the divergent results.)

Now let's look at some other emerging and growing trends in Internet job search.

The passive candidate rules.
So, you say you really love your job and have no plans to look elsewhere? But wouldn't you maybe be receptive to being wooed by an employer trying to lure you to its team? More and more employers are counting on your receptivity and are courting employed candidates who are ostensibly not looking for a job. Why? The theory is that you are a better candidate if you're employed. It's a vast oversimplification and exaggeration to say there's something wrong with you if you're not employed, yet many employers tend to think roughly in those terms. "Those with critical skills and those who are high performers are almost always employed and, as a consequence, seldom if ever look for a job," reports Weddle's newsletter.

For every year of this Annual Report, we've noted that employers are flooded with resumes, most of them from inappropriate, unqualified candidates. Failing to develop screening systems that can effectively manage the inundation, they are turning to the strategy of recruiting the passive candidate. Employers have also discovered that online recruiting may help them fill positions -- but not necessarily with the best people. So they are more aggressively going after passive candidates, perceived to be better performers than those who are out of work or looking for a new job.

Weddle refers to the current "War for Talent" as replacing "the quantitative struggle for more candidates" with "a qualitative contest for extraordinary candidates." That approach makes it much harder for active job-seekers, who are now often seen as second-class citizens. It also means that employers hunger more than ever for referrals of good people to fill positions. And it means that face-to-face recruiting is gaining new importance. After all, as Weddle points out, search engines and portals miss 84 percent of the workforce because only 16 percent of all workers are actively looking for a job at any given time, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.

If you are happily employed but open to being recruited, you may want to know about our next trend…

"Googlability" grows more sophisticated.
Alice Hanson, a Seattle-based recruiter who worked for for a large software company recently described how she finds candidates: "The first thing I do is go to Google and look for resumes that are posted to the Internet. These are the first people I call because they are free," she explained. "The next is members in professional organizations and people listed in ZoomInfo (a site that provides a compilation of any mention of a person anywhere on the Web in any search engine) and on Linkedin.com."

Hanson continued, "We go through our own database of resumes and see if there are any 'live ones.' Then, we target competitive firms that we want to raid and cold call for referrals of people that they know who are looking and get their resumes. If all that fails, the last option is paying good money to search through Monster.com and specialty databases. Monster is the dead-last place we look."

The average job-seeker probably does not think about the importance of Google and the other online sites the recruiter mentioned. Sullivan calls Google "the best-funded recruiting machine on the planet." He also cites ZoomInfo as "the best source for finding employed top performers who are not actively seeking a new job … (i.e., the difference-makers)." Poor Monster. Of the giant job board, Sullivan writes, "Being big without demonstrating quality and the fact that people actually get hired and successfully perform on the job is no longer acceptable."

Bottom line: Your online presence is more important than ever, and even if you are not actively seeking a new job, an online presence, in which you pop up in Google and other searches, can open up some unexpected opportunities.

As if to underscore the importance of Googlability, Mark Berger of Swat Recruiting offers a book to recruiters called Power Searching for Free Resumes on Google -- A Guide to Advanced Search Techniques and Methods, providing "advanced methods utilized for locating qualified resumes of passive candidates on Google." Similarly, JobMachine.net offers a "Google CheatSheet for Recruiters." It doesn't take too much imagination to deduce that resources offering recruiters tips on finding candidates through Google might also prove valuable for candidates who want to be found on Google.

So, how else do you enhance your online presence and Googlability? That question takes us to our next trend …

Personal Branding becomes more important.
A significant way to build an online presence is through personal branding, which may include creating a blog, an online portfolio, an online resume, participating in online networking sites, such as LinkedIn, Ryze, and ecademy, as well as some creative new modes.

But, it's not the means of delivering an online presence that is most important -- it's the content, and specifically, the personal-branding content. Deborah Wile Dib, a CEO coach with multiple certifications in personal branding, resume writing, and career coaching, notes that "companies and recruiters are looking for passive candidates and active candidates with strong brands -- clearly defined value propositions and differentiators. They are looking for fit. They are looking for authenticity and passion -- the courage of a candidate to be real.

"Candidates need to stand out from thousands, even millions, of others," Dib continues. "How? Recruiters and companies want candidates who are less 'transactional' (translation: task-oriented) and more 'relational' (translation: branded, visible, active, networked). Companies and recruiters want candidates who can clearly and effortlessly articulate a differentiated and powerful value proposition (translation: the most compelling reason they should be hired!)."

Examples of individuals with a well-branded online presence include Nina Burokas and other people whose portfolios were designed by the talented folks at Brandego.com.

New ways of building a branded online presence pop up all the time. Authors listed on Amazon.com can now create a profile on the site. Squidoo enables people to become "Lensmasters" and demonstrate their expertise in a field by creating a Squidoo Web page that the site says will "increase your profile." The site's FAQ goes on to tout that "a popular lens gives credibility to the Lensmaster. A popular lens reinforces your role as an 'everyday expert.'" The Reach Branding Club offers "personal branding tools you need to take your business or career to the next level."

For more about enhancing your brand, see our articles, Building Your Brand: Tactics for Successful Career Branding, A Dozen Things You Must Know About Communicating Your Career Brand, and Taking Networking to the Next Level: Getting Your Name Out There.

For more about portfolios, see our articles, Your Job Skills Portfolio: Giving You an Edge in the Marketplace, Expanding the Definition and Use of Career Portfolios, and Proof of Performance: Career Portfolios an Emerging Trend for Both Active and Passive Job-Seekers.

For more about social networking, see our article, Maximizing Online Social Networking.

But building your online presence is not without risks, as we see in our next observation …

Posting damaging personal information on the Web grows riskier.
Several major media outlets this spring exhorted readers about the dangers of posting information online that could get them screened out by employers. Sites noted as especially subject to risky postings were those that primarily appeal to younger people -- sites such as MySpace.com and Facebook.com.

In a survey by executive job-search and recruiting network ExecuNet of 100 executive recruiters, 77 use search engines to learn more about candidates. Of those, who use sites such as Google and Yahoo to check the background of job seekers, 35 have eliminated a candidate from consideration based on the information uncovered online -- up significantly from 26 percent just a year ago.

It's not just executive recruiters who want to ensure candidates have an unblemished online presence; Alan Finder of The New York Times reports that "many companies that recruit on college campuses have been using search engines like Google and Yahoo to conduct background checks on seniors looking for their first job. But now, college career counselors and other experts say, some recruiters are looking up applicants on social networking sites like Facebook.com, MySpace, Xanga and Friendster, where college students often post risqué or teasing photographs and provocative comments about drinking, recreational drug use and sexual exploits in what some mistakenly believe is relative privacy."

Read more about the dangers of posting questionable information in this Career Journal article, a blog entry by Steve Rothberg of CollegeRecruiter.com, and Alan Finder's New York Times story ($3.95 cost) .

Employers and recruiters are deploying novel online approaches to locating the best candidates.
The "War for Talent" is pushing employers and recruiters to use or create new models to find good workers.

One is what Weddle calls "career community centers," such as TalentZoo.com, with a "Lounge" area where visitors can, according the site, "gather around and catch up on the latest industry news, trends, and entertaining articles."

Another is TopCoder, which offers weekly competitions for software programmers, the partial purpose of which are to help employers "determine which candidate is best suited to the needs of your organization," the site states. "While certification has offered some credibility, the Web-page text continues, "competitions that test a developer's skills in real-world challenges go much further to differentiating one candidate from another."

But one model that employers may be using less of brings us to our final emerging trend …

The traditional resume may be on its way out.
Citing online recruiting expert Sullivan, as well as Allan Schweyer of the Human Capital Institute, Deborah Dib prognosticates that "within a few years most companies who are hiring or recruiting on line will use e-profiles in place of the traditional resume. E-profiles allow access to information that is sorted and easy to use." Dib's finger is on the pulse of those who predict that paperless recruiting will become the norm. Again, the bombardment of resumes zapped to employers electronically is one of the culprits behind this prediction. While the resume may disappear from online job search and morph into new forms and spin-offs, it will still be used for mailing, networking, and interviewing. no matter what form the resume takes, expert word-smithing will still be required, Dib notes, "to compose keyword-rich online profiles and resume builders, and to develop compelling success stories for interviews."

Final Thoughts
At a decade or so old, Internet job-hunting has become fully embraced by job-seekers. Candidates have more choices than ever given that, according to Weddle, the Web is populated with some 40,000 job boards (get Weddle's advice for choosing the best boards in this article). Many kinks in the process still must be ironed out, but the trends are more positive than negative. Indeed, new models, twists, and approaches to the online job search potentially lend excitement for both employers and job-seekers. Quintessential Careers is celebrating its 10th anniversary at a fascinating time for the Internet job search.

Questions about some of the terminology used in this article? Get more information (definitions and links) on key college, career, and job-search terms by going to our Job-Seeker's Glossary of Job-Hunting Terms.

Katharine Hansen, Ph.D., creative director and associate publisher of Quintessential Careers, is an educator, author, and blogger who provides content for Quintessential Careers, edits QuintZine, an electronic newsletter for jobseekers, and blogs about storytelling in the job search at A Storied Career. Katharine, who earned her PhD in organizational behavior from Union Institute & University, Cincinnati, OH, is author of Dynamic Cover Letters for New Graduates and A Foot in the Door: Networking Your Way into the Hidden Job Market (both published by Ten Speed Press), as well as Top Notch Executive Resumes (Career Press); and with Randall S. Hansen, Ph.D., Dynamic Cover Letters, Write Your Way to a Higher GPA (Ten Speed), and The Complete Idiot's Guide to Study Skills (Alpha). Visit her personal Website or reach her by e-mail at kathy(at)quintcareers.com.

Go to the directory page of the Quintessential Careers Annual Reports on the State of Internet Job-Hunting.